Online Judge | Problem Set | Authors | Online Contests | User | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Web Board Home Page F.A.Qs Statistical Charts | Current Contest Past Contests Scheduled Contests Award Contest |
Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering.In Reply To:Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. Posted by:frkstyc at 2007-12-29 15:26:53 好的,谢谢 我自己好好想想吧。 > 这个报告是写得很乱我承认,不过我觉得你完全是没有自己思考过就只跟着报告的思路走,这样是不行的 > 报告想表达的基本意思就是不是所有opt_i都是有用的,有些以为a_i的原因没用了,而且一旦它被标成没用 > 了,就永远没用了,不用再被考虑。报告给出了一个形式,你总可以自己推导一下吧。 > Followed by: Post your reply here: |
All Rights Reserved 2003-2013 Ying Fuchen,Xu Pengcheng,Xie Di
Any problem, Please Contact Administrator