譬如a_l到a_k这一段是
(l                   k)
 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 0
 ^ ^       ^     ^ ^ ^
标了^的都是要的，譬如说那个4，以为后面都是0,1,2,3比4小，所以就要了

> 解题报告里的这句话是什么意思啊？
> 对着样例看了看，还是不明白。描述是准确的么？

• Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (222) Thank_you 2007-12-28 19:03:10
  • Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (99) frkstyc 2007-12-28 20:08:52
    • Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (225) Thank_you 2007-12-29 13:54:20
      • Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (310) frkstyc 2007-12-29 14:34:32
        • Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (133) Thank_you 2007-12-29 15:12:17
          • Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (204) frkstyc 2007-12-29 15:26:53
            • Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (171) Thank_you 2007-12-29 20:33:47
• Re:But further observation reveals that only those indices in the set I = { l, k } ∪ { i : l < i < k ∧ opti > max i < j ≤ k { aj } } are worth considering. (159) Thank_you 2007-12-31 12:43:02