| ||||||||||
| Online Judge | Problem Set | Authors | Online Contests | User | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web Board Home Page F.A.Qs Statistical Charts | Current Contest Past Contests Scheduled Contests Award Contest | |||||||||
这个太**了。。。明显南京不会那么少名额。。。。今年的分配完全不合理。。。In Reply To:周老师给的Poucher的解释: Posted by:alpc04 at 2007-12-25 19:58:58 > 你好! > > 有关名额分配是Poucher根据各个赛区的参赛学校数、参赛队数、解出一题以上的 > 队数、以及下属赛区的参赛队数计算出来的,见附件中的( > > Dr. Poucher’s calculation on the registration count is a weighted system. > > # of university has highest weight; # of teams has second highest weight; > > Other smaller weighted factors are: # of teams getting non-zero scores; > > and # of teams in the preliminary contest such as national contest, provincial contest, and university contest. Only those in the ICPC registration system are counted.) > > 注册在icpc.baylor.edu上的成都赛区的学校数为66, 是今年亚洲13个赛区中最多的, > 南京赛区学校数只有61, 另上成都赛区解出一题以上的队数大于南京赛区, 所以成都 > 赛区的名额会比南京多一点点。 按理说成都赛区的复旦大学应该是不计算名额, > 但不将复旦入列的话就需要在ICPC网站上修改相关的数据, 由于ICPC网站的成绩更新 > 非常麻烦, 考虑到后续的学校均是重复出线的队, 对成都赛区其他学校是否出线无 > 影响,所以黄教授就将复旦列入了。 > > 祝 > 好! > 周维民 Followed by:
Post your reply here: |
All Rights Reserved 2003-2013 Ying Fuchen,Xu Pengcheng,Xie Di
Any problem, Please Contact Administrator