2.what the hell with the time limit thing.
#include<iostream>
#include<iomanip>
#include<string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
    string m1,m2;
    int n,k,x=0,pp[3],limit,d[7]={1,0,0,2,1,1,0};
    pp[2]=101;
    while(cin>>n)
    {
       if(n==0)break;
       if(x)cout<<endl;
       x=1;
       cin>>k;
       int p[101]={0},w[101]={0};
       limit=k*((n*(n-1))/2);
       for(int i=0;i<limit;i++)
       {
          cin>>pp[0]>>m1>>pp[1]>>m2;
          w[pp[d[m1[0]-m2[0]+3]]-1]++;
          p[pp[d[m1[0]-m2[0]+3]]-1]++;
          p[pp[d[m2[0]-m1[0]+3]]-1]++;
       }      
       for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
       {
           if(p[i]==0){cout<<"-"<<endl;continue;}    
           cout<<fixed<<setprecision(3)<<float(w[i])/p[i]<<endl;
       }    
    }
    return 0;
}

• ...iostream比scanf慢很多,或许是100倍,超时不足为奇啦 (0) bug27 2007-03-06 19:11:33
• Empirical tests show iostream objects are several times slower than stdio functions on our system. (875) frkstyc 2007-03-06 21:12:30
  • Re:Empirical tests show iostream objects are several times slower than stdio functions on our system. (0) hasan83 2007-03-07 00:33:17
  • Re:Empirical tests show iostream objects are several times slower than stdio functions on our system. (81) hasan83 2007-03-07 00:35:49
    • Re:Empirical tests show iostream objects are several times slower than stdio functions on our system. (155) frkstyc 2007-03-07 11:05:52