| ||||||||||
| Online Judge | Problem Set | Authors | Online Contests | User | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web Board Home Page F.A.Qs Statistical Charts | Current Contest Past Contests Scheduled Contests Award Contest | |||||||||
Teams to world finalsDear Asia Directors and Coaches:
(Initial Recommendation for Finals Slots.)
It has been a great year for Asia ICPC because of your strong support
and encouragement. Thanks for your suggestions and many meetings with you.
I will try to sort out all of your suggestions when final slots are settled.
Site Directors may pass this message to anybody.
(1) The following Part I is the earned slots from each site calculated by
Dr. Poucher. Poucher used a formula based on the total number of universities
registered in each site plus some bonus pints. Asia earned a total of 26 slots this year.
The bonus points include total # of teams registered, total # of teams in preliminary contests, and # of teams solving at least one problem.
(2) The Part II is my initial recommendations for World Finals. I am holding some
slots in a few sites waiting for the outcome of Coimbatore site. Over there, there are
many foreign teams registered and it will be another big battle. After the battle, I will
make additional recommendations.
(3) The Part III is to show you how I calculate the slots for each site. I drew a line on the ranking of each site cutting thru some good break points based on the earned slots. I also adjust the lines with other criteria such as the reasonable balance of development
of all sites, the host universities near the break point line, and the multiple teams of universities. If a university has only 1 qualified team within the lines, I count one slot
used for the site. If a university has 4 teams qualified within lines, I count each team 0.25 slots for the site in which the team registered. I used this same formula last year. The Part III indicates the slot used for each team, and the slot used for the site. This calculation is
for references only. It is not used for final recommendation. The balance of all factors is
the most important criterion for the recommendation. This calculation is to confirm the
recommendation is a good one
(4) The three sites from Mainland China earned us a total 13.7 slots. For the balance
of development of all sites, I recommend only 8+ slots for those 3 sites and there are 9+ Chinese teams for Finals from all Asia sites. They helped all sites to get more slots.
Thanks to them for the great jobs done.
Part I: Slots earned for each site: (Scores by Dr. Poucher)
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Beijing 4.5
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - ChengDu 2.5
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Coimbatore 1.1
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Dhaka 1.0
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Hangzhou 6.7
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Kolkata 1.5
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Manila 1.0
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Seoul 1.7
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Taipei 1.6
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Tehran 1.7
>>The 2005 ACM Asia Programming Contest - Tokyo 1.8
Part II:
Partial List of Teams Recommended to World Finals
1. Shanghai JiaoTong University- Nimrod (From Taipei)
2. Tsinghua University- THU1 (From Chengdu Site)
3. Fudan University- Abacus (From Dhaka)
4. Zhongshan University- ZSU_Cangjie (From Hangzhou)
5. Peking University- Monkey King (From Hangzhou)
6. Remin University of China- Juggernaut (From Beijing)
7. ZheJiang Univerisity- Sailor (From Taipei)
8. SiChuan University- Derek (From Chengdu)
9. FuZhou University- Laplacian (From Hangzhou)
10. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay- SPUTNIK (From Kolkata)
11. Anna University, Madras Inst. Of Technology- BLITZKREIG (From Kolkata)
12. Kyoto University- Combat (From Tokyo)
13. National Taiwan University- [] (From Tokyo)
14. University of Tokyo- eXtreme GNC-4 w/ System/360(ry (From Manila)
15. University of Dhaka- DU Gryffindor (From Dhaka)
16. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology- BUET Exceed (From Dhaka)
17. University of Hong Kong- Fate (From Manila)
18. Ateneo De Manila University- The Linden BoyZ (From Manila)
19. Seoul National University- NSU team2 Ra! (From Seoul)
20. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology- Davidoff (From Seoul)
21. Chinese University of Hong Kong- zy-x (from Taipei)
22. Sharif University of Technology- Ihrvatar (from Tehran)
23. Shalhid Beheshti University- Untitled.cpp[t] (From Tehran)
Part III. Calculations by Asia Director
This calculation is for references only. It is not used for final recommendation. The
balance of all factors is the most important criterion for the recommendation. This
calculation is to confirm the recommendation is a good one.
1. Beijing Site (total used slots 2.1 from 4.5)
(Tsinghua 0.25; Fudan 0.25; SJTU 0.12; Zhongshan 0.2; PKU 0.33;
Remin U 0.5; Zhongshan 0.2; Tsinghua 0.25)
2. ChengDu Site (total used slots 2.4 from 2.5)
(Tsinghua 0.25; SJTU 0.12; SiChuan 1.0; ReminU 0.5; PKU 0.33;
Zhongshan 0.2)
3. Coimbator Site (TBD)
4. Dhaka Site (total used slots 2.25 from 1.0)
(Fudan 0.25; U Dhaka 1.0; BUET 1.0)
5. HangZhou Site (total used slots 3.43 from 6.7)
(Tsinghua 0.25; SJTU 0.12; PKU 0.33; Zhongshan 0.2; Fudan 0.25;
FuZhou U 1.0; ZJU 0.33; CUHK 0.5; SJTU 0.12; ZJU 0.33)
6. Kolkata Site (total used slots 2.0 from 1.5)
(IIT Bombay 1.0; Anna U 1.0)
7. Manila Site (total used slots 2.3 from 1.0)
(UHK 1.0; Tokyo 0.3; AD Manila 1.0)
8. Seoul Site (total used slots 2.12 from 1.7)
(SJTU 0.12; Seoul NU 1.0; KAIST 1.0)
9. Taipei Site (total used slots 1.77 from 1.6)
(SJTU 0.12; CUHK 0.5; Zhongshan 0.2; ZJU 0.33; SJTU 0.12; NTU 0.5)
10. Tehran Site (total used slots 2.0 from 1.7)
(Sharif 1.0; Shalhid BU 1.0)
11. Tokyo Site (total used slots 2.47 from 1.8)
(SJTU 0.12; Kyoto 1.0; Fudan 0.25; Tokyo U 0.3; Tokyo 0.3; NTU 0
Followed by:
Post your reply here: |
All Rights Reserved 2003-2013 Ying Fuchen,Xu Pengcheng,Xie Di
Any problem, Please Contact Administrator