i can't understand what the trick is. for 496903 i submitted the same program as i did for 496902, 
and for 496904 i adjusted fpu control word for higher precision. but both got wa having been 
compiled with ms vc. in 2 later submissions i enlarged the size of my arrays to avoid access 
violation but it didn't work. would hawk give me some hint on this?

• ooo...i've got it...trapped by floating point error again.... (368) 00448264 2005-06-19 23:53:02
  • another lesson: early optimization is sin. (0) 00448264 2005-06-20 00:00:07
• 您打算搞ACM，干吗切那么多题？ (368) js05 2005-06-20 09:19:10
  • 昨晚看电磁学看得我郁闷了 (0) frkstyc 2005-06-20 09:21:14
  • 搞ACM就不能切很多题么?? (0) queyue2004 2005-06-20 11:05:53
  • 搞ACM就不能切很多题么?? (0) queyue2004 2005-06-20 11:05:55
    • 在我印象中，STYC不打算搞ACM。。。 (0) js05 2005-06-20 14:14:57
      • 那他搞什么呢? (0) xfxyjwf 2005-06-20 17:18:26
        • 让你猜一次，猜错了bg (0) frkstyc 2005-06-20 17:20:10
          • 俨然只亏不赚 (0) xfxyjwf 2005-06-20 17:23:32
            • 不是俨然，是必然 (0) frkstyc 2005-06-20 17:23:51